stv.vote // Stirling, Scotland Trossachs and Teith

The Stirling, Scotland May 2022 was held on May 5, 2022. 3 seats were filled using Single Transferable Vote from 8 candidates over 7 rounds.

In STV, candidates who reach the quota (1,344 votes) are elected. Surplus votes above the quota are transferred to voters' next preferences. When no candidate reaches the quota, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated and their votes are transferred.

Elected candidates:

  1. Martin Earl
  2. Gene Maxwell
  3. John Watson

Votes needed to win: 1,344 votes 5,3723+1+1\left\lfloor \frac{5,372}{3 + 1} \right\rfloor + 1

Votes needed to win: 1,344Martin EarlElected in round 1Gene MaxwellElected in round 6John WatsonElected in round 8 (final)Elaine WattersonEliminated in round 7Josh HamiltonEliminated in round 5Wendy FaulknerEliminated in round 4Galen MilneEliminated in round 3Dolores HughesEliminated in round 2

STV Rounds

This Sankey diagram shows the votes of each remaining candidate at each round, as well as the breakdown of votes transferred when each candidate was elected (surplus transfers) or eliminated.

Note that the tabulation (but not the winner) may differ from the official count. You can read more about why this is.

Round 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7Martin EarlGene MaxwellJohn WatsonJosh HamiltonWendy FaulknerElaine WattersonGalen MilneDolores HughesExhausted37.8%19.2%14.2%9.1%8.3%7.2%25%20.1%14.5%9.6%9.6%13.5%25%20.2%14.5%9.7%9.7%13.9%25%20.4%14.7%11%10.7%14.8%25%23.6%16.4%13.8%15.5%5.7%25%26.3%17.7%17.7%13.3%25%25%18.9%17.7%13.3%Martin EarlGene MaxwellJohn WatsonElaine WattersonExhausted

Candidate Clustering

This visualization shows candidates positioned based on second-choice transfers. Candidates whose voters frequently rank each other appear closer together, forming natural "clusters" or voting blocs.

Distance is based on the First Alternate table below — if voters who rank candidate A first often rank candidate B second (and vice versa), they'll appear close together. In STV, proportional representation means winners should be distributed across different clusters, representing diverse voter preferences.

Circle size indicates first-round vote share. Green circles are elected candidates. Hover over candidates to see their top second-choice transfers.

EarlFaulknerHamiltonHughesMaxwellMilneWatsonWattersonLegendElectedNot elected

Pairwise Preferences

For every pair of candidates, this table shows the fraction of voters who preferred one to the other. A preference means that either a voter ranks a candidate ahead of the other, or ranks one candidate but does not list the other. Ballots which rank neither candidate are not counted towards the percent counts.

Note: In multi-seat STV elections, pairwise preferences show overall voter sentiment but don't directly determine outcomes, since votes transfer through multiple elimination and surplus rounds.

Less-preferred Candidate
Preferred Candidate
Martin Earl
Gene Maxwell
John Watson
Elaine Watterson
Josh Hamilton
Wendy Faulkner
Galen Milne
Dolores Hughes
Martin Earl0%56.3%56.4%80.3%67.5%61.3%72.4%89.6%
Gene Maxwell43.7%0%60.1%51.4%60.7%62.2%63.3%84.9%
John Watson43.6%39.9%0%50.7%60.1%61%62.2%84.6%
Elaine Watterson19.7%48.6%49.3%0%57.1%52.7%61.9%85.4%
Josh Hamilton32.5%39.3%39.9%42.9%0%42.5%56.3%84.2%
Wendy Faulkner38.7%37.8%39%47.3%57.5%0%61.9%85.2%
Galen Milne27.6%36.7%37.8%38.1%43.7%38.1%0%82.6%
Dolores Hughes10.4%15.1%15.4%14.6%15.8%14.8%17.4%0%

First Alternate

For every pair of candidates, this table shows the fraction of voters who ranked one candidate first ranked the other candidate second.

Second Choice
First Choice
Martin Earl
Gene Maxwell
John Watson
Elaine Watterson
Josh Hamilton
Wendy Faulkner
Galen Milne
Dolores Hughes
Exhausted
Martin Earl0%3.2%1.8%72.3%5.8%5.3%4.4%0.7%6.5%
Gene Maxwell2.6%0%84.6%0.5%2.1%7.7%1.1%0.4%1.1%
John Watson3.4%85.2%0%0.4%1.8%5.7%0.9%0.3%2.4%
Elaine Watterson89.4%0.8%1.3%0%0.5%0.5%3.9%0.5%3.1%
Josh Hamilton13.2%7.9%4.9%4.3%0%20.2%31.4%3.1%15.1%
Wendy Faulkner9.2%31.1%15.1%1.1%20.9%0%11.9%2.9%7.7%
Galen Milne14.9%4.8%4.8%7.4%30.3%21.8%0%2.1%13.8%
Dolores Hughes24.4%2.4%2.4%7.3%7.3%7.3%7.3%0%41.5%

This report was generated by stv.vote and may be reproduced under CC-BY. Learn more about stv.vote.

card