stv.vote // Stirling, Scotland Stirling North

The Stirling, Scotland May 2022 was held on May 5, 2022. 4 seats were filled using Single Transferable Vote from 7 candidates over 4 rounds.

In STV, candidates who reach the quota (1,018 votes) are elected. Surplus votes above the quota are transferred to voters' next preferences. When no candidate reaches the quota, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated and their votes are transferred.

Elected candidates:

  1. Susan McGill
  2. Rachel Nunn
  3. Danny Gibson
  4. Amy Smith

Votes needed to win: 1,018 votes 5,0864+1+1\left\lfloor \frac{5,086}{4 + 1} \right\rfloor + 1

Votes needed to win: 1,018Danny GibsonElected in round 1Susan McGillElected in round 1Rachel NunnElected in round 1Amy SmithElected in round 5Jim ThomsonEliminated in round 4Oliver FranklinEliminated in round 3Shena McLellandEliminated in round 2

STV Rounds

This Sankey diagram shows the votes of each remaining candidate at each round, as well as the breakdown of votes transferred when each candidate was elected (surplus transfers) or eliminated.

Note that the tabulation (but not the winner) may differ from the official count. You can read more about why this is.

Round 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Susan McGillRachel NunnDanny GibsonAmy SmithJim ThomsonOliver FranklinShena McLellandExhausted25.7%22.8%20.2%13.7%12.6%20%20%20%17.3%16.8%20%20%20%17.6%17%20%20%20%19.6%17.4%Susan McGillRachel NunnDanny GibsonAmy SmithJim ThomsonExhausted

Candidate Clustering

This visualization shows candidates positioned based on second-choice transfers. Candidates whose voters frequently rank each other appear closer together, forming natural "clusters" or voting blocs.

Distance is based on the First Alternate table below — if voters who rank candidate A first often rank candidate B second (and vice versa), they'll appear close together. In STV, proportional representation means winners should be distributed across different clusters, representing diverse voter preferences.

Circle size indicates first-round vote share. Green circles are elected candidates. Hover over candidates to see their top second-choice transfers.

FranklinGibsonMcGillMcLellandNunnSmithThomsonLegendElectedNot elected

Pairwise Preferences

For every pair of candidates, this table shows the fraction of voters who preferred one to the other. A preference means that either a voter ranks a candidate ahead of the other, or ranks one candidate but does not list the other. Ballots which rank neither candidate are not counted towards the percent counts.

Note: In multi-seat STV elections, pairwise preferences show overall voter sentiment but don't directly determine outcomes, since votes transfer through multiple elimination and surplus rounds.

Less-preferred Candidate
Preferred Candidate
Amy Smith
Susan McGill
Danny Gibson
Rachel Nunn
Jim Thomson
Oliver Franklin
Shena McLelland
Amy Smith0%39.3%47.9%59.5%43.1%63%83.2%
Susan McGill60.7%0%55.7%63.2%65.8%65.9%84.7%
Danny Gibson52.1%44.3%0%62.6%46.6%70.1%88%
Rachel Nunn40.5%36.8%37.4%0%38.1%52%78%
Jim Thomson56.9%34.2%53.4%61.9%0%64.9%83.9%
Oliver Franklin37%34.1%29.9%48%35.1%0%82.1%
Shena McLelland16.8%15.3%12%22%16.1%17.9%0%

First Alternate

For every pair of candidates, this table shows the fraction of voters who ranked one candidate first ranked the other candidate second.

Second Choice
First Choice
Amy Smith
Susan McGill
Danny Gibson
Rachel Nunn
Jim Thomson
Oliver Franklin
Shena McLelland
Exhausted
Amy Smith0%38%16.7%3.6%24%9.2%2%6.5%
Susan McGill9.7%0%7.1%1.1%76.2%0.8%0.2%4.8%
Danny Gibson17.5%11.2%0%14.2%6%24.3%3.8%23%
Rachel Nunn5%2.2%24.6%0%2.1%25.8%7.6%32.7%
Jim Thomson8.3%77.9%5.8%1.1%0%1.2%0.6%5.1%
Oliver Franklin21.6%4.7%38.4%15.8%2.1%0%5.8%11.6%
Shena McLelland12.5%4.7%6.3%40.6%4.7%6.3%0%25%

This report was generated by stv.vote and may be reproduced under CC-BY. Learn more about stv.vote.

card