stv.vote // Scottish Borders, Scotland Hawick and Hermitage

The Scottish Borders, Scotland May 2022 was held on May 5, 2022. 3 seats were filled using Single Transferable Vote from 7 candidates over 5 rounds.

In STV, candidates who reach the quota (762 votes) are elected. Surplus votes above the quota are transferred to voters' next preferences. When no candidate reaches the quota, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated and their votes are transferred.

Elected candidates:

  1. Watson McAteer
  2. Jane Cox
  3. Annette Smart

Votes needed to win: 762 votes 3,0453+1+1\left\lfloor \frac{3,045}{3 + 1} \right\rfloor + 1

Votes needed to win: 762Watson McAteerElected in round 1Jane CoxElected in round 6Annette SmartElected in round 6 (final)Cameron KnoxEliminated in round 5Rosemary WebsterEliminated in round 4Robert LeachEliminated in round 3Kevin FergusonEliminated in round 2

STV Rounds

This Sankey diagram shows the votes of each remaining candidate at each round, as well as the breakdown of votes transferred when each candidate was elected (surplus transfers) or eliminated.

Note that the tabulation (but not the winner) may differ from the official count. You can read more about why this is.

Round 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Watson McAteerJane CoxAnnette SmartCameron KnoxRobert LeachRosemary WebsterKevin FergusonExhausted48.5%18.4%16.7%6.3%25%19.8%17.6%15.3%5.4%9.1%25%20%18.8%15.6%5.2%5.7%9.7%25%20.4%19.7%16.4%7.1%11.3%25%21.9%20.9%18.1%14%Watson McAteerJane CoxAnnette SmartCameron KnoxExhausted

Candidate Clustering

This visualization shows candidates positioned based on second-choice transfers. Candidates whose voters frequently rank each other appear closer together, forming natural "clusters" or voting blocs.

Distance is based on the First Alternate table below — if voters who rank candidate A first often rank candidate B second (and vice versa), they'll appear close together. In STV, proportional representation means winners should be distributed across different clusters, representing diverse voter preferences.

Circle size indicates first-round vote share. Green circles are elected candidates. Hover over candidates to see their top second-choice transfers.

CoxFergusonKnoxLeachMcAteerSmartWebsterLegendElectedNot elected

Pairwise Preferences

For every pair of candidates, this table shows the fraction of voters who preferred one to the other. A preference means that either a voter ranks a candidate ahead of the other, or ranks one candidate but does not list the other. Ballots which rank neither candidate are not counted towards the percent counts.

Note: In multi-seat STV elections, pairwise preferences show overall voter sentiment but don't directly determine outcomes, since votes transfer through multiple elimination and surplus rounds.

Less-preferred Candidate
Preferred Candidate
Watson McAteer
Jane Cox
Annette Smart
Cameron Knox
Rosemary Webster
Robert Leach
Kevin Ferguson
Watson McAteer0%75%76.4%82.3%84.6%86.8%83.7%
Jane Cox25%0%56%41.5%60.6%67.2%62.3%
Annette Smart23.6%44%0%36.1%56.7%65.3%67.7%
Cameron Knox17.7%58.5%63.9%0%71.8%78.1%73.1%
Rosemary Webster15.4%39.4%43.3%28.2%0%62.7%54.3%
Robert Leach13.2%32.8%34.7%21.9%37.3%0%43.9%
Kevin Ferguson16.3%37.7%32.3%26.9%45.7%56.1%0%

First Alternate

For every pair of candidates, this table shows the fraction of voters who ranked one candidate first ranked the other candidate second.

Second Choice
First Choice
Watson McAteer
Jane Cox
Annette Smart
Cameron Knox
Rosemary Webster
Robert Leach
Kevin Ferguson
Exhausted
Watson McAteer0%16%7.9%46.4%5.6%2.4%2.9%18.8%
Jane Cox38.2%0%1.3%14.3%10.7%4.8%3.6%27.1%
Annette Smart21.4%1.8%0%5.1%6.1%9.2%38.1%18.3%
Cameron Knox57.6%12.6%5.8%0%3.7%3.1%4.2%13.1%
Rosemary Webster34.5%14.2%11.5%7.1%0%15%4.4%13.3%
Robert Leach17.5%7%13.2%5.3%21.9%0%14.9%20.2%
Kevin Ferguson13.6%7.4%40.7%6.2%7.4%16%0%8.6%

This report was generated by stv.vote and may be reproduced under CC-BY. Learn more about stv.vote.

card