stv.vote // Midlothian, Scotland Midlothian South

The Midlothian, Scotland May 2022 was held on May 5, 2022. 3 seats were filled using Single Transferable Vote from 8 candidates over 6 rounds.

In STV, candidates who reach the quota (1,239 votes) are elected. Surplus votes above the quota are transferred to voters' next preferences. When no candidate reaches the quota, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated and their votes are transferred.

Elected candidates:

  1. Kelly Drummond
  2. Douglas Bowen
  3. Ellen Scott

Votes needed to win: 1,239 votes 4,9543+1+1\left\lfloor \frac{4,954}{3 + 1} \right\rfloor + 1

Votes needed to win: 1,239Kelly DrummondElected in round 1Douglas BowenElected in round 7 (final)Ellen ScottElected in round 7Hazel FlanaganEliminated in round 6Robin StenhouseEliminated in round 5Malcolm Gray SpavenEliminated in round 4Daniel FraserEliminated in round 3Christopher Ringland HamptonEliminated in round 2

STV Rounds

This Sankey diagram shows the votes of each remaining candidate at each round, as well as the breakdown of votes transferred when each candidate was elected (surplus transfers) or eliminated.

Note that the tabulation (but not the winner) may differ from the official count. You can read more about why this is.

Round 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Kelly DrummondEllen ScottDouglas BowenRobin StenhouseHazel FlanaganMalcolm Gray SpavenDaniel FraserChristopher Ringland HamptonExhausted25.1%21.1%20.3%12.9%11.6%7%25%21.1%20.3%12.9%11.6%7.1%25%21.2%20.4%13%11.7%7.2%25%21.3%20.5%13.3%11.9%7.5%25%23.9%21.6%13.7%13.7%25%24.3%22.1%20.2%8.3%Kelly DrummondEllen ScottDouglas BowenHazel FlanaganExhausted

Candidate Clustering

This visualization shows candidates positioned based on second-choice transfers. Candidates whose voters frequently rank each other appear closer together, forming natural "clusters" or voting blocs.

Distance is based on the First Alternate table below — if voters who rank candidate A first often rank candidate B second (and vice versa), they'll appear close together. In STV, proportional representation means winners should be distributed across different clusters, representing diverse voter preferences.

Circle size indicates first-round vote share. Green circles are elected candidates. Hover over candidates to see their top second-choice transfers.

BowenDrummondFlanaganFraserHamptonScottSpavenStenhouseLegendElectedNot elected

Pairwise Preferences

For every pair of candidates, this table shows the fraction of voters who preferred one to the other. A preference means that either a voter ranks a candidate ahead of the other, or ranks one candidate but does not list the other. Ballots which rank neither candidate are not counted towards the percent counts.

Note: In multi-seat STV elections, pairwise preferences show overall voter sentiment but don't directly determine outcomes, since votes transfer through multiple elimination and surplus rounds.

Less-preferred Candidate
Preferred Candidate
Ellen Scott
Kelly Drummond
Douglas Bowen
Hazel Flanagan
Robin Stenhouse
Malcolm Gray Spaven
Daniel Fraser
Christopher Ringland Hampton
Ellen Scott0%48.9%52.2%49.5%69.2%71%86.6%90.6%
Kelly Drummond51.1%0%50.9%66.3%77.3%65.4%91%88.4%
Douglas Bowen47.8%49.1%0%49.6%69.4%71.1%87.3%91.5%
Hazel Flanagan50.5%33.7%50.4%0%76.4%64.9%91.5%88.2%
Robin Stenhouse30.8%22.7%30.6%23.6%0%38.1%66.6%65.9%
Malcolm Gray Spaven29%34.6%28.9%35.1%61.9%0%81.9%83%
Daniel Fraser13.4%9%12.7%8.5%33.4%18.1%0%52.6%
Christopher Ringland Hampton9.4%11.6%8.5%11.8%34.1%17%47.4%0%

First Alternate

For every pair of candidates, this table shows the fraction of voters who ranked one candidate first ranked the other candidate second.

Second Choice
First Choice
Ellen Scott
Kelly Drummond
Douglas Bowen
Hazel Flanagan
Robin Stenhouse
Malcolm Gray Spaven
Daniel Fraser
Christopher Ringland Hampton
Exhausted
Ellen Scott0%4.2%81.6%3.3%0.3%5.6%0.1%0.4%4.4%
Kelly Drummond2.3%0%3.2%86.8%2.6%1.5%0.2%0.1%3.3%
Douglas Bowen78.3%7.3%0%1.5%0.4%4.8%0.6%1.8%5.4%
Hazel Flanagan3.3%81.3%3.3%0%3.7%2.4%1.7%0.2%4%
Robin Stenhouse2%26.2%2.2%20.1%0%6.1%7.5%2.4%33.4%
Malcolm Gray Spaven35%15.5%14.6%12.6%5.2%0%1.1%2.6%13.5%
Daniel Fraser1.7%6.9%8.6%8.6%25.9%15.5%0%10.3%22.4%
Christopher Ringland Hampton13.6%2.3%18.2%4.5%11.4%15.9%11.4%0%22.7%

This report was generated by stv.vote and may be reproduced under CC-BY. Learn more about stv.vote.

card