stv.vote // Edinburgh, Scotland Sighthill-Gorgie

The Edinburgh, Scotland May 2022 was held on May 5, 2022. 4 seats were filled using Single Transferable Vote from 8 candidates over 7 rounds.

In STV, candidates who reach the quota (1,676 votes) are elected. Surplus votes above the quota are transferred to voters' next preferences. When no candidate reaches the quota, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated and their votes are transferred.

Elected candidates:

  1. Ross McKenzie
  2. Catherine Fullerton
  3. Denis Dixon
  4. Dan Heap

Votes needed to win: 1,676 votes 8,3754+1+1\left\lfloor \frac{8,375}{4 + 1} \right\rfloor + 1

Votes needed to win: 1,676Ross McKenzieElected in round 1Catherine FullertonElected in round 4Denis DixonElected in round 6Dan HeapElected in round 8Mark HooleyEliminated in round 7Ashley GraczykEliminated in round 5Devin ScobieEliminated in round 3David HenryEliminated in round 2

STV Rounds

This Sankey diagram shows the votes of each remaining candidate at each round, as well as the breakdown of votes transferred when each candidate was elected (surplus transfers) or eliminated.

Note that the tabulation (but not the winner) may differ from the official count. You can read more about why this is.

Round 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Round 6Round 7Ross McKenzieCatherine FullertonDenis DixonDan HeapMark HooleyAshley GraczykDevin ScobieDavid HenryExhausted23%18.7%17.5%13.3%11.8%9.5%20%19.6%18%14%11.9%9.7%20%20%18.4%14.3%12%10.1%20%20.3%18.7%15.3%13.3%11%20%20%19%15.3%13.3%11%20%20%21%18.7%15.3%20%20%20%19.5%15.3%Ross McKenzieCatherine FullertonDenis DixonDan HeapMark HooleyExhausted

Candidate Clustering

This visualization shows candidates positioned based on second-choice transfers. Candidates whose voters frequently rank each other appear closer together, forming natural "clusters" or voting blocs.

Distance is based on the First Alternate table below — if voters who rank candidate A first often rank candidate B second (and vice versa), they'll appear close together. In STV, proportional representation means winners should be distributed across different clusters, representing diverse voter preferences.

Circle size indicates first-round vote share. Green circles are elected candidates. Hover over candidates to see their top second-choice transfers.

DixonFullertonGraczykHeapHenryHooleyMcKenzieScobieLegendElectedNot elected

Pairwise Preferences

For every pair of candidates, this table shows the fraction of voters who preferred one to the other. A preference means that either a voter ranks a candidate ahead of the other, or ranks one candidate but does not list the other. Ballots which rank neither candidate are not counted towards the percent counts.

Note: In multi-seat STV elections, pairwise preferences show overall voter sentiment but don't directly determine outcomes, since votes transfer through multiple elimination and surplus rounds.

Less-preferred Candidate
Preferred Candidate
Ross McKenzie
Dan Heap
Denis Dixon
Catherine Fullerton
Mark Hooley
Ashley Graczyk
Devin Scobie
David Henry
Ross McKenzie0%54.2%48.8%46.6%75.9%67.2%75.3%84.9%
Dan Heap45.8%0%41%38.8%68.6%61.8%63.6%83.8%
Denis Dixon51.2%59%0%43.3%71.2%65.4%65.5%88.2%
Catherine Fullerton53.4%61.2%56.7%0%72.5%67.7%67.3%88.8%
Mark Hooley24.1%31.4%28.8%27.5%0%39.4%38.7%60.5%
Ashley Graczyk32.8%38.2%34.6%32.3%60.6%0%49.1%75.1%
Devin Scobie24.7%36.4%34.5%32.7%61.3%50.9%0%74.9%
David Henry15.1%16.2%11.8%11.2%39.5%24.9%25.1%0%

First Alternate

For every pair of candidates, this table shows the fraction of voters who ranked one candidate first ranked the other candidate second.

Second Choice
First Choice
Ross McKenzie
Dan Heap
Denis Dixon
Catherine Fullerton
Mark Hooley
Ashley Graczyk
Devin Scobie
David Henry
Exhausted
Ross McKenzie0%13.8%7.3%8.4%9.8%8.9%26.3%2.4%23%
Dan Heap23.5%0%14.2%31.7%1.7%12.1%6.7%1.2%9%
Denis Dixon3.2%5.1%0%84.7%1.2%1.5%0.5%1.2%2.6%
Catherine Fullerton4.9%6.8%77.6%0%0.4%3.5%1.1%1%4.7%
Mark Hooley27.6%2.8%1.2%1.6%0%14.6%23.1%1.8%27.2%
Ashley Graczyk19.6%21.3%5.3%15.9%10.4%0%8.3%5.6%13.6%
Devin Scobie33.6%13%2%4%17.8%11%0%2%16.7%
David Henry14%6.7%19.5%15.9%5.5%20.7%7.3%0%10.4%

This report was generated by stv.vote and may be reproduced under CC-BY. Learn more about stv.vote.

card