stv.vote // Aberdeen, Scotland Kincorth-Nigg-Cove

The Aberdeen, Scotland May 2022 was held on May 5, 2022. 4 seats were filled using Single Transferable Vote from 8 candidates over 5 rounds.

In STV, candidates who reach the quota (960 votes) are elected. Surplus votes above the quota are transferred to voters' next preferences. When no candidate reaches the quota, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated and their votes are transferred.

Elected candidates:

  1. Alex Nicoll
  2. Richard Brooks
  3. Miranda Radley
  4. Lynn Thomson

Votes needed to win: 960 votes 4,7974+1+1\left\lfloor \frac{4,797}{4 + 1} \right\rfloor + 1

Votes needed to win: 960Richard BrooksElected in round 1Alex NicollElected in round 1Miranda RadleyElected in round 2Lynn ThomsonElected in round 5Moira HendersonEliminated in final roundHeather HerbertEliminated in final roundCharlie AbelEliminated in round 4Bryce HopeEliminated in round 3

STV Rounds

This Sankey diagram shows the votes of each remaining candidate at each round, as well as the breakdown of votes transferred when each candidate was elected (surplus transfers) or eliminated.

Note that the tabulation (but not the winner) may differ from the official count. You can read more about why this is.

Round 1Round 2Round 3Round 4Round 5Alex NicollRichard BrooksLynn ThomsonMiranda RadleyMoira HendersonCharlie AbelHeather HerbertBryce HopeExhausted30.5%21.1%18.8%15.2%6.5%20%20%19.1%25%7.7%20%20%19.5%20%8%6%20%20%19.6%20%8.2%6.1%20%20%20.6%20%8.7%7.4%Alex NicollRichard BrooksLynn ThomsonMiranda RadleyMoira HendersonHeather HerbertExhausted

Candidate Clustering

This visualization shows candidates positioned based on second-choice transfers. Candidates whose voters frequently rank each other appear closer together, forming natural "clusters" or voting blocs.

Distance is based on the First Alternate table below — if voters who rank candidate A first often rank candidate B second (and vice versa), they'll appear close together. In STV, proportional representation means winners should be distributed across different clusters, representing diverse voter preferences.

Circle size indicates first-round vote share. Green circles are elected candidates. Hover over candidates to see their top second-choice transfers.

AbelBrooksHendersonHerbertHopeNicollRadleyThomsonLegendElectedNot elected

Pairwise Preferences

For every pair of candidates, this table shows the fraction of voters who preferred one to the other. A preference means that either a voter ranks a candidate ahead of the other, or ranks one candidate but does not list the other. Ballots which rank neither candidate are not counted towards the percent counts.

Note: In multi-seat STV elections, pairwise preferences show overall voter sentiment but don't directly determine outcomes, since votes transfer through multiple elimination and surplus rounds.

Less-preferred Candidate
Preferred Candidate
Alex Nicoll
Miranda Radley
Richard Brooks
Lynn Thomson
Moira Henderson
Heather Herbert
Charlie Abel
Bryce Hope
Alex Nicoll0%67%65.8%59.9%67.1%80.9%86%90%
Miranda Radley33%0%64.4%57.9%65.1%80%84.8%89.3%
Richard Brooks34.2%35.6%0%38.5%48.7%49.1%60.4%74.6%
Lynn Thomson40.1%42.1%61.5%0%62.9%63.3%73.9%88.5%
Moira Henderson32.9%34.9%51.3%37.1%0%53.8%66.7%86.4%
Heather Herbert19.1%20%50.9%36.7%46.2%0%65.2%83.9%
Charlie Abel14%15.2%39.6%26.1%33.3%34.8%0%68.9%
Bryce Hope10%10.7%25.4%11.5%13.6%16.1%31.1%0%

First Alternate

For every pair of candidates, this table shows the fraction of voters who ranked one candidate first ranked the other candidate second.

Second Choice
First Choice
Alex Nicoll
Miranda Radley
Richard Brooks
Lynn Thomson
Moira Henderson
Heather Herbert
Charlie Abel
Bryce Hope
Exhausted
Alex Nicoll0%87.2%0.6%2.5%1.3%1.5%1.5%0.1%5.3%
Miranda Radley88.9%0%0.3%2.1%1%4.2%1.5%0.3%1.8%
Richard Brooks2.6%0.3%0%29.7%28.1%1.8%2%1.7%33.9%
Lynn Thomson8.3%8.8%12.4%0%26.4%9.4%3.7%1.5%29.4%
Moira Henderson9.9%4.1%18.5%30.6%0%8.6%2.2%2.2%23.9%
Heather Herbert25%15.4%1.9%16%17.9%0%5.1%3.2%15.4%
Charlie Abel37.5%8.7%9.2%9.2%4.3%9.8%0%4.9%16.3%
Bryce Hope10.3%6.9%24.1%13.8%10.3%6.9%13.8%0%13.8%

This report was generated by stv.vote and may be reproduced under CC-BY. Learn more about stv.vote.

card